Description
Basic data
Format | Full frame |
Focusing | Auto Focus |
Type | Telephoto zoom |
Mounts | Canon EF, Canon EF-S, Minolta A, Nikon DX, Nikon FX, Pentax K, Sony A |
Specification
Blades | 7 |
Filter (mm) | 72 |
Length (mm) | 87 |
Min focus (m) | 1.8 |
Weight (g) | 495 |
Aperture | 3.8 – 5.6/22 |
Focal Length (mm) | 28-200 |
Overall rating
3.64
based on 5 reviews
bokeh (5)
5/5
mechanical quality (4)
4/5
optical quality (3)
3/5
usability (3)
3/5
value (5)
5/5
Alternatives
-
Sigma 28-200mm f/3.5-5.6 DL Hyperzoom Macro Aspherical IF
More expensieve price ($200) and better user rating (4.75)
-
Sigma AF 28-200mm f/3.5-5.6 DL Aspherical Macro
More expensieve price ($72) and better user rating (4.25)
-
Tamron AF 28-200mm f/3.8-5.6 Aspherical 71D
More expensieve price ($22) and better user rating (4.1)
-
Tamron AF 28-200mm f/3.8-5.6 Aspherical LD IF 171D
More expensieve price ($41) and better user rating (4.29)
-
Tamron AF 28-200mm f/3.8-5.6 Aspherical LD IF 371D
More expensieve price ($32) and better user rating (4.67)
-
Tamron AF 28-200mm f/3.8-5.6 Aspherical LD IF 571D
More expensieve price ($32) and better user rating (4.2)
-
Tamron AF 28-200mm f/3.8-5.6 XR Aspherical IF
More expensieve price ($45) and better user rating (4.03)
-
Tamron AF 28-200mm f/3.8-5.6 XR Di Aspherical (IF) Macro
More expensieve price ($68) and better user rating (4.75)
-
Tamron AF 28-200mm f/3.8-5.6 XR Di Aspherical (IF) Macro A031
More expensieve price ($98) and better user rating (4.67)
-
Tamron AF 28-200mm f/3.8-5.6 XR Di Aspherical IF
More expensieve price ($82) and better user rating (4.75)
-
allphotolenses.com –
1.0 allphotolenses.com user rated as 3.8/5
ebay.com –
3 ebay.com user rated as 4.25/5
lens-club.ru –
5 lens-club.ru user rated as 3.64/5
Ebay.com Jul 04, 2017 –
Good value but not good image quality I own and have owned several great Sigma lenses over the years but this is not one of them. For any serious photographer this not the lens for you. Image quality suffers throughout all focal lengths. The 135mm length is really the only sweet spot on this lens and it is not great. There are better lens out there in this focal length range.
Ebay.com Feb 09, 2014 –
Good choice if you are on a budget. A solid, affordable lens; great for traveling when you don’t want to lug a lot of glass. I have used it fairly extensively since I bought it, and I am generally pleased with the results. Low light performance could be better, but for the prices can’t really complain.
Ebay.com Sep 22, 2020 –
Sigma lens Good lens for the money. Good quality photos